Poor Ad Placement by a Premium Publisher

You would think by this point in the development of online advertising things like this wouldn’t happen. As I read the New York Time’s coverage of the tragic loss of Malaysian Air Flight 370, a large banner expanded in the middle of the page. It was a photograph of a stretch of empty ocean with clouds across the horizon.

Screen Shot 2014-03-24 at 11.09.48 AM

When the image initially appeared I assumed it was content related to the story. When I read the copy I realized it was promoting the Fontainbleau hotel in Miami and was frankly stunned.

So what went wrong? Was the placement determined by the content of the story? Are the automated systems in use so trusted that human review is no longer part of the process? Have publishers cut back on the resources to review placements to ensure they aren’t adding insult to injury?

Whatever the cause, this type of juxtaposition of advertising and editorial isn’t OK. Publishers need to do a better job of policing the user experience to prevent damage to their own brands and to their advertisers.

It’s worth noting that within 30 minutes of my seeing this ad it no longer appeared in the story. That’s a good thing but it’s unfortunate that this occurred at all.

About these ads

One thought on “Poor Ad Placement by a Premium Publisher

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s